This article gives a careful, source-based comparison of reported contracts and endorsements for Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese. It explains why headline endorsement figures can be misleading and shows which publicly reported items are verifiable. The goal is to help fans and sports-prediction users interpret coverage responsibly when assessing who might have more money.

Public reporting through 2026 shows Caitlin Clark with the largest publicly reported endorsement figure among the two players.

WNBA rookie base salaries in 2024 were similar for top picks and are small compared with marquee endorsement deals.

Headline endorsement values often reflect potential upside rather than guaranteed cash.

What 'more money' actually means: contracts, endorsements, and net worth

Definitions: contract value versus realized income, wnba props today

When readers ask who "has more money" they often mean one of several different measures: headline contract value, guaranteed cash, annual salary, or personal net worth. For a clear comparison, start by defining these terms. "Contract value" is the total maximum worth a contract might pay over its full term. "Guaranteed income" is the portion a player will receive regardless of future conditions. "Annual salary" is what a player earns from their team in a season, and "net worth" tries to capture assets minus liabilities for a person at a point in time.

These distinctions matter because reported figures often mix them. A headline endorsement number is commonly an "up to" or maximum figure that can include performance bonuses, royalties, and product sales components that may never fully materialize. That makes reliance on headline values risky when estimating actual cash flow or true net worth.

For sports-prediction users and fans who follow daily lines and wnba props today, it helps to treat headline endorsements as indicators of marketability rather than guaranteed income. For related analysis, see the Funded Plays homepage Funded Plays.

Caitlin Clark's reported eight-year Nike endorsement, frequently cited in public reporting, is a headline example of a large contract that raises lifetime earnings potential, but its public presentation does not mean every dollar is guaranteed in hand today Reuters report on Clark's Nike deal.

Learn more about FundedPlays Challenges

Read the short, sourced comparison below to see which public items matter most and where uncertainty remains.

View challenge options

Quick comparison: what public reporting shows for Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese

Headline deals and what they imply

Public reporting shows Caitlin Clark as the subject of several high-profile endorsement arrangements that together suggest greater contracted endorsement value to date. One frequently cited item is an eight-year Nike deal reported as worth up to a sizable total and including a signature shoe, which signals a high level of brand investment in Clark Reuters report on Clark's Nike deal. This reporting is complemented by other coverage, including a multiyear endorsement write-up from ESPN about Clark's Wilson agreement ESPN coverage of Clark's Wilson deal.

Beyond that Nike item, reporting also documented a multiyear partnership with Wilson that includes signature basketballs, another sign that brands are creating product lines tied to Clark's name CNN reporting on Clark's Wilson deal. See also Wilson's official collaboration page for product details Wilson x Caitlin Clark.

By contrast, WNBA rookie base salaries for 2024 were modest relative to endorsement headlines, with public sources listing $76,535 for the No. 1 pick and $73,439 for the No. 7 pick, a difference that is small compared with brand-deal values CBS Sports rookie salary report.

Both Clark and Angel Reese also received national-brand exposure in a rookie-class partnership with Beats by Dre, which contributes to each player's market profile though terms were not publicly disclosed ESPN coverage of the Beats partnership.

Angel Reese entered the pro ranks with her own notable early partnership signed under Reebok, a deal announced in 2023 that helped establish her commercial standing before and after the draft ESPN report on Reese's Reebok deal.

Contracts versus endorsement deals: why endorsements usually dominate the gap

How endorsement structures differ from player salaries

Endorsement contracts typically include multiple components: guaranteed signing money, multi-year minimums, royalty or profit-share provisions tied to product sales, performance bonuses, and clauses for renewals or buyouts. That mix lets a single major endorsement eclipse a player salary over time when product lines or long-term commitments are in place.

Signature product arrangements are especially important because they can create royalty streams beyond the contract's upfront payment. For example, a signature shoe or ball can produce ongoing revenue if sales remain strong, which is why signature-product elements matter as much as headline dollar totals in many reports CNN reporting on Clark's Wilson deal. Additional reporting on Clark's signature basketballs provides further context Sportico coverage.

Who has more money, Angel Reese or Caitlin Clark?

Based on public reporting through 2026, Caitlin Clark most likely has higher contracted endorsement value and therefore greater lifetime earnings potential, though precise net worths remain unverifiable.

When comparing contracts, remember that base team salary is recurring and predictable for a season, while endorsement value is often lumpy and conditional; endorsements can therefore widen lifetime earning gaps even when initial team pay is similar.

Because public reporting sometimes states a top-line figure such as an "up to" amount, analysts should treat those as maximums rather than guaranteed transfers of cash unless the reporting explicitly confirms guaranteed payouts Reuters report on Clark's Nike deal.

How rookie WNBA salaries work and what the public salary figures mean

2024 rookie salary numbers and scale

The WNBA rookie scale reported for 2024 shows entrances salaries in the mid five figures, with the No. 1 draft pick listed at $76,535 and the No. 7 pick at $73,439; these amounts are the standardized baseline for first-season guaranteed pay under that scale CBS Sports rookie salary report.

These base salaries are meaningful for budgeting and short-term cash but are small relative to the headline values of multiyear endorsement deals that appear in reporting. For most top rookies, off-court partnerships become the dominant component of early-career earnings when they materialize.

Quick first-year cash estimate using conservative inputs

Use conservative endorsement inputs

Policy context also matters because NIL-era exposure and college-era partnerships shaped the pre-draft commercial profiles of both players; updated NCAA guidance clarified how college-era endorsement activities could be structured for athletes entering pro leagues NCAA NIL guidance update.

For readers doing a quick WNBA rookie salary comparison, remember to separate guaranteed team income from potential endorsement upside and to document which items are publicly reported guarantees versus reported maximums. For more scenario examples see our blogs Funded Plays blogs.

How high-profile endorsements shifted the public view of who 'has more money'

Notable deals and their signaling effect

High-visibility partnership announcements change public perception because they are headline-friendly and easy to share. Caitlin Clark's reported Nike arrangement and her Wilson signature basketball partnership are prominent examples that elevate perceived commercial value in media narratives Reuters report on Clark's Nike deal.

Both Clark and Angel Reese benefitted from a Beats by Dre rookie-class partnership that increased national exposure for each player, a kind of signal that raises future endorsement potential even when contract terms remain private ESPN coverage of the Beats partnership.

Angel Reese's Reebok deal, announced under new leadership, was an early indicator of her marketability and gave brands an identifiable fit for her public profile ESPN report on Reese's Reebok deal.

These announcements often become shorthand for wealth in public conversations, but announcer excitement or media repetition does not replace the need to verify contract guarantees and the timing of any payments.

Evaluating the evidence: what we can confidently say and what remains unknown

Confirmed items from reporting

From public reporting we can list a set of confirmed items: Caitlin Clark's reported Nike deal, Clark's Wilson partnership, the WNBA rookie salary numbers for 2024, a Beats by Dre rookie-class partnership that included both players, and Angel Reese's Reebok agreement. Each of these items has been presented in public news reporting and can be cited as a known event Reuters report on Clark's Nike deal.

What remains unknown includes the full, private terms of many NIL and endorsement arrangements, the precise timing and structure of payments, taxes, agent fees, and personal expenses that influence any individual's net worth. Those private details prevent an exact, verified net worth comparison between Clark and Reese.

Because many endorsement contracts use language like "up to" a certain amount, the public numbers can overstate realized income if interpreted as guaranteed cash. Treat "up to" or maximum-value figures as potential ceilings rather than confirmed deposits into a bank account.

Common mistakes and pitfalls when comparing athletes' money

Mistaking headline value for guaranteed cash

A frequent error is to take headline endorsement values at face value as guaranteed cash. That mistake leads to overstated estimates of an athlete's liquid wealth because it ignores conditions, performance triggers, and revenue-share mechanisms often embedded in deals.

Funded Plays Challenges

View challenge options

Another common pitfall is failing to account for timing differences. A multiyear deal can show a large total value but still pay out over many seasons, which affects present-day spending power and year-by-year comparisons.

Finally, analysts sometimes double-count potential future earnings or combine unverified rumors with reported items. Use only publicly reported contracts and clearly label assumptions when you estimate net worth or lifetime earnings.

Practical scenarios: three side-by-side examples readers can use

Scenario A: Comparing reported headline deal values

Scenario A compares the most visible headline figures. Using the widely reported item for Caitlin Clark, a long-term, high-value endorsement with a signature shoe is the single largest public endorsement figure tied to either athlete in reporting Reuters report on Clark's Nike deal. Additional reporting on Clark's signature basketballs is available from Sportico Sportico coverage, and ESPN has also reported on Clark's Wilson partnership ESPN coverage of Clark's Wilson deal. Angel Reese's Reebok agreement is also notable, but reported headlines for Clark's major Nike arrangement show a larger headline endorsement figure in public sources ESPN report on Reese's Reebok deal.

Assumption checklist for Scenario A: treat headline figures as maximum potential; do not assume royalties or sales milestones are achieved; list guarantees separately if a source confirms them. Under conservative assumptions Scenario A points to Clark having greater contracted endorsement value in public reporting.

Scenario B: Comparing realistic first-year cash and exposure

Scenario B uses first-year guaranteed team salary plus any confirmed, guaranteed endorsement payments for the first season. Start with the rookie salary baseline, which is in the mid five figures for both players, and then add any confirmed signing bonuses or guaranteed endorsement cash if publicly reported CBS Sports rookie salary report.

Because public reporting has not published full guaranteed-endorsement breakdowns for all deals, a conservative Scenario B will often show only small differences between the players in year-one cash. That makes rookie salary comparison useful for short-term cash estimates but insufficient to understand lifetime earning potential.

Scenario C: Long-term endorsement potential versus short-term salary

Scenario C models lifetime earning potential under conservative product-sales assumptions. When a player has a signature product, future royalties and renewals can add materially to lifetime earnings. Clark's publicly reported signature shoe and Wilson partnership illustrate how signature products can create multi-year revenue streams beyond a rookie salary CNN reporting on Clark's Wilson deal.

To use Scenario C responsibly, make explicit assumptions about product sales, royalty rates, and contract length. Running conservative and optimistic cases shows the range of plausible lifetime earnings instead of presenting a single, unsupported net worth figure.

Bottom line: what the best available evidence suggests and how to talk about it responsibly

Concise conclusion

Based on public reporting through 2026, the preponderance of verified headline contracts and endorsements points to Caitlin Clark having higher contracted endorsement value and therefore greater lifetime earnings potential, while recognizing that private terms and net worth remain unverifiable Reuters report on Clark's Nike deal.

WNBA rookie salaries are similar between the two players and are small compared with endorsement values, so rookie pay alone does not determine which player "has more money" in public perception or likely lifetime earnings CBS Sports rookie salary report.

As a fan or analyst, cite primary reporting when possible, clearly separate guaranteed figures from potential upside, and be cautious about sharing precise net worth estimates that cannot be independently verified. Read more on how we evaluate contexts at Funded Plays how Funded Plays evaluates contexts.

Why is it hard to determine who 'has more money' between athletes?

Because many endorsement and NIL contract terms are private, public figures often show maximum potential rather than guaranteed payouts, and taxes, fees, and timing affect actual net worth.

Do rookie WNBA salaries explain who earns more overall?

No. Rookie salaries are modest and similar for top draft picks; endorsements and multiyear partnerships typically drive larger differences in lifetime earnings.

Can reported endorsement totals be treated as guaranteed income?

Not automatically. Reported totals often include conditional components, so treat 'up to' figures as potential ceilings unless guaranteed amounts are explicitly confirmed.

When discussing athletes' finances, prioritize verified reporting and be explicit about assumptions. Use the scenarios above to frame short-term cash estimates separately from lifetime endorsement potential, and avoid presenting unverified net worth figures as fact.