This guide explains the 50 22 concept in rugby union for readers who want a clear, practice-focused understanding. It is written for fans, players, and analysts who may not be experts in the laws but who want to know how the tactic influences match decisions. The article frames the concept in plain language, highlights tactical implications, offers a short decision checklist, and gives three concise match scenarios. Where competition-specific wording matters, readers are reminded to consult the official laws before applying details in coaching or competitive contexts.

The 50 22 links a long, accurate kick from deep with the chance to secure a favourable, structured restart.

Success depends on accurate kicking, opponent setup, and match-state discipline rather than pure power.

Coaches should log attempts and practice under match-like conditions to turn the 50 22 into a reliable tool.

What the 50 22 concept refers to in rugby

Brief, plain-language definition, rugby betting sites context

The 50 22 concept is a specific tactical opportunity in rugby union that rewards a well-placed kick with improved territory and a structured restart. For readers coming from different perspectives, including those who follow rugby betting sites, it is helpful to think of the 50 22 as a targeted kicking option designed to turn a defensive clearance into a controlled attacking platform.

Close up of a rugby kicker mid swing with teammates and defenders blurred in the background highlighting technique and form for rugby betting sites header image

At a basic level the idea links a kick from an area roughly around a team’s own half to the location where play restarts. The aim for the kicking team is to gain territory while forcing a static restart for the opposition in a location that is advantageous for the kicking team to contest. This short explanation is intended as a conceptual guide. Specific procedural details, such as exactly who takes the resulting lineout throw, can vary with competition rules so always check the official laws for the competition concerned before applying the detail in coaching or wagering contexts.

The phrase 50 22 often appears alongside other territory kicking terms, because it changes the calculus of when to kick, when to retain possession, and how to shape defensive lines. In simple terms, the 50 22 adds a tactical choice: accept a kick that gives territory and a structured restart, or keep the ball and continue a running phase. The best teams make that choice with clear criteria in mind.

Why teams introduced this tactic recently

The 50 22 concept was introduced to encourage tactical variety and to reward accurate kicking from deeper positions. It creates more incentives for teams to practice long, accurate kicks that find space and touch under pressure. As a result, teams that invest time in reproducing these kicks in training can change how their defensive and attacking structures work, because the reward is not only lost territory for the opposition but also a predictable restart that can be planned for.

Coaches and analysts often highlight that the 50 22 opens new defensive responsibilities, since defending teams must now account for the risk of conceding both field position and a favourable set piece. The evolution of kicking strategy means players are asked to combine traditional clearance kicks with precise placement, and to do so more often when conditions, field position, and match state align.

How the 50 22 works in practice

Typical sequence of events on the field

A typical 50 22 attempt begins when a team in possession decides to kick from around the halfway region or its own half into space near the opponent's touchline. The objective is to find touch at or beyond a particular distance from the kicker, producing a restart that favours the kicking team. When the kick sails into touch under the intended conditions, the match moves to a set piece that often gives the kicking side a chance to contest the ball or start an attacking move from close range.

In practical terms the sequence is usually short. The kicker prepares while teammates shape the receiving pattern, the ball is kicked with a balance of height and distance, and the defense tries to position to either collect the kick or prevent a lineout weapon from having a clean opportunity. If successful, the kicking team gains the territorial advantage it sought and can plan the next phase from a more dominant position on the field.

Try structured challenges that sharpen decision-making

Explore structured practice options and challenge-style drills to sharpen kicking and decision-making in controlled environments, focusing on repeatable executions and measurable feedback.

View FundedPlays Challenges

Role of officials and what they look for

Match officials monitor a few clear points during a 50 22 attempt. They check where the kick was taken from, where the ball lands, and whether the ball went into touch under the specific conditions defined for that competition. Referees and touch judges also watch for any infringements in the lead-up, such as offside positions or illegal hands in the ruck, that could affect whether the restart is awarded as expected.

Because competitions can adopt slightly different playing regulations, officials will apply the wording of the law or competition rule in force for the match. That is why teams brief players on any competition-specific differences before kickers practise or attempt such kicks in games. Where uncertainties arise, teams typically ask the referee or match officials for clarification on procedural points before or after the game, and coaches review the official competition documents for precise guidance.

When the 50 22 is an active part of the tactical toolbox, attackers will position kickers and receivers to maximize the chance of a clean, effective kick. The attacking formation often places a kicker who can execute both distance and accuracy, supported by backline players who can exploit the resulting field position. Receivers and support players plan for an immediate contest or a set play off the restart.

Defensive units change shape as well. A defensive line aware of the 50 22 threat may push players deeper or allocate designated cover defenders near the touchline to neutralize deep kicks. This adjustment can open lanes elsewhere on the field, because defenders who would normally press the gain line are instead covering potential kicking channels. The net effect is a chess match between who cedes space and who risks giving up a structured restart.

Kickers and coaches weigh the reward of gaining territory and a favourable restart against the risk of losing clean possession should the kick be poorly executed. A successful 50 22 attempt can flip the field and give the kicking team a planned platform to attack. By contrast, an inaccurate kick can hand possession to the opposition under far less favourable conditions.

For possession planning, teams may adopt mixed strategies. In some phases they choose to retain ball and probe the defense, while at other times they opt for a long, calculated kick to force a set piece. The availability of the 50 22 as a tactic encourages more deliberate decision rules about when to trade continuous possession for the chance of a controlled restart deep in the opponent's half.

When to attempt a 50 22: decision criteria

Key situational factors determine whether attempting a 50 22 is sensible. Consider field position, score margin, remaining time in the match, weather and wind, and the relative kicking skill of the player selected to execute the kick. These variables help quantify whether the potential territorial gain justifies the possession risk.

Player-level considerations matter too. A kicker who can place long kicks accurately under pressure raises the probability of success. Teams will typically avoid using less-confident kickers for high-value attempts unless they practise the play extensively in training and demonstrate reliability.

How should teams choose between retaining possession and attempting a 50 22 kick?

Teams should weigh field position, kicker reliability, match state, environmental conditions, and the opponent's defensive shape. Use a short checklist and logged outcomes to make consistent in-game choices.

Decision rules often also reflect match state, for example whether the team is protecting a narrow lead late in the game or chasing points with limited time remaining. In general, disciplined teams set clear cut-offs in advance so that players can make consistent choices during the match without needing to improvise under pressure.

Another practical consideration is the opponent's setup. If the opposition consistently leaves space behind their first line of defense or positions insufficient cover near the touchline, the value of a 50 22 attempt rises. Conversely, if the opponent commits a specialist returner or keeps their wide defenders deep, the risk-reward balance shifts away from attempting the kick.

Common mistakes and how to avoid them

Execution errors

Poor kick placement is the most frequent execution error. A kick that lacks distance or precision gives the opponent an easy lineout or possession close to the kicking team, undoing any territorial advantage. To reduce this, coaches should break the kick into repeatable technical elements in training and measure outcomes carefully.

Another execution mistake is choosing the wrong height for the kick. Too low and the ball is easier to chase and pick up, too high and it may be intercepted or allow the defense to reorganize. Practising the timing and contact point helps kickers develop a feel for the balance between height and distance in different conditions.

Tactical misreads

Tactical errors include attempting the kick at an unsuitable time, for example when the match state demands retaining possession for a structured attack. Another common misread is ignoring wind and weather. Strong side winds or heavy rain can severely reduce the likelihood of success, so teams must factor environmental variables into their decision rules.

Coaching corrections for tactical misreads focus on scenario training. Use conditioned drills that force quick decisions under time pressure, simulate relevant weather effects where possible, and review game footage so players learn to identify opponent setups that either favour or negate the 50 22 option.

Practical examples and match scenarios

Funded Plays Challenges

View FundedPlays Challenges

Three short, annotated scenarios

Scenario 1, early-possession strategic kick. A team starts an attacking set near halfway and notices that the opposition defensive line is shallow on one flank. The kicker opts for a long, angled kick towards touch beyond the opponent's 22 metre area. If the kick succeeds, the kicking team gets a territorial gain and a predictable restart near the opponent's try area, allowing planned plays on the resulting lineout.

Scenario 2, late-game territory play. With minutes remaining and a small lead to protect, a team elects to use a 50 22-style kick to force a lineout deep inside the opponent's half, reducing the chance for the opposition to build sustained possession. The decision prioritizes territory and a controlled restart over continuous attacking phases.

Scenario 3, counter-attacking set-up. A team under pressure executes a quick turnover and immediately looks to exploit space behind the defensive line. A precise long kick into touch creates an instant change of field position and a set piece where the kicking side can mount a structured attack rather than relying on open play recovery.

In each scenario, watch for the opponent's positioning. A shallow defensive line or absence of a dedicated returner increases the likelihood that the kick will produce the intended reward. Conversely, if the opponent maintains disciplined depth and commits players to cover wide channels, the risk of a failed attempt rises.

As always, confirm any procedural outcomes such as throw allocation and restart position against the competition's official rules before using the specific details in match plans or in contexts related to wagering. Rules can differ slightly between competitions.

Decision framework for coaches and competitive players

Use this compact, repeatable in-game checklist to evaluate a prospective 50 22 attempt quickly.

1) Field position and space, is there enough room to reach the target zone with the necessary margin for error. 2) Kicker readiness, does the selected player demonstrate recent practice success. 3) Match state, does the score and time make territorial gain a priority. 4) Weather and wind, will conditions support the intended flight and landing. 5) Opponent setup, is the defensive coverage likely to leave exploitable space.

Training priorities include repeated technical kicking drills, scenario simulations that replicate match pressure, and defensive shape work so that both executing and defending teams understand the adjustments required. Log attempts and outcomes systematically to measure which conditions yield success, and adjust decision thresholds over time based on real performance data.

For iterative improvement, keep a simple log for each attempt that records: wind and weather, kicker, distance achieved, landing location relative to the mark, and the resulting possession outcome. Over a season, this data becomes a practical guide to refining decision rules and practice focus areas. (See Funded Plays evaluations for an example.)

Wrap-up: next steps and further reading

To recap, the 50 22 concept offers a tactical option that pairs territorial gain with a structured restart, shifting decisions about possession and kicking into a more deliberate space. It is valuable to teams that practice accurate long kicks and that can prepare defensive responses to new threats. Also visit the Funded Plays blog for related articles.

Before applying specific procedural details in coaching sessions, match preparation, or any context where the exact rule wording matters, consult the official competition laws and the relevant match regulations. Those documents provide the final authority on how restarts are awarded and administered in any given competition.

Quick video review checklist for 50 22 kicks

Kick setup
Contact point
Landing zone
Opponent setup

Use slow motion and markers to log outcomes

What is the basic purpose of the 50 22 concept?

It is a tactical kicking option designed to gain territory and force a structured restart that can favour the kicking team, as a complement to running play.

Does every competition apply the same 50 22 procedure?

No, procedural details such as who throws at the lineout or exact placement requirements can vary by competition, so check the official rules for the event.

How should teams practice the 50 22 idea?

Practice precise long kicks in varied conditions, simulate match scenarios that force quick decisions, and log outcomes to refine decision rules over time.

If you want to deepen your practical understanding, combine targeted practice, video review, and small data logging of attempts to see how often the tactic pays off for your team. Use official competition documents for procedural certainty and continue to refine decision thresholds based on measured outcomes. A disciplined approach to practice and review will make the 50 22 a repeatable option rather than a one-off gamble.