This article gives a clear, evidence-based answer to where MyBookie AG appears to operate from. It summarizes what the site’s own legal pages and the ICANN domain record show, explains why those records matter for U.S. users, and outlines practical steps to verify location and evaluate risk. The goal is to help readers make informed decisions about account safety and dispute options by focusing on public records and regulator guidance rather than speculation. If you need to act quickly, the short checklist in the article shows the first verification steps to take.

MyBookie’s public legal pages show a Curaçao mailing address rather than a U.S. corporate headquarters.

The mybookie.ag domain uses a .ag registration and ICANN records do not reveal a public registrant name.

Regulators have issued notices against offshore operators, which can limit state-level consumer protections.

Quick answer: Where is MyBookie AG located? mybookie sports home

Short answer, in plain terms: MyBookie’s public pages show a Curaçao mailing presence rather than a clearly disclosed U.S. corporate headquarters, and the domain registration does not reveal a public registrant name.

The site’s own Terms and Privacy pages list a Curaçao address as the mailing contact, which suggests an offshore footprint rather than a stateside registered office MyBookie Terms and Conditions.

Where is MyBookie AG located?

MyBookie’s public legal pages list a Curaçao mailing address and the mybookie.ag domain’s public registration details do not reveal a named registrant, so the site presents itself as an offshore operator without a clearly disclosed U.S. corporate headquarters.

For many readers that means treat the site as an offshore operator unless independent corporate filings say otherwise. The on-site pages are what users should rely on for immediate contact and governing details, but they do not definitively prove where an operating company is incorporated.

Short summary for readers who want a fast answer

MyBookie’s visible legal pages provide a Curaçao mailing address on their terms and privacy statements, and its domain is registered under a .ag top-level domain with limited public WHOIS details, so ownership and a concrete corporate headquarters are not transparently disclosed ICANN lookup.

Why public records matter

Public records such as terms pages, privacy policies and WHOIS lookups help users locate the declarative contact points a site offers; when those records omit a clear corporate registration or show privacy-shielded domain data, independent verification becomes more important. A point-in-time view of on-site disclosures is useful, but it is not always a substitute for corporate filings or regulator registers.

The mybookie sports home domain and on-site pages reflect the immediate contact points a site provides rather than the full corporate picture in public filings.

What the mybookie sports home domain and on-site pages show

Close up of Terms and Conditions web page showing mailing address line Curaçao on a white content card set against dark background mybookie sports home

The site’s Terms and Privacy pages list a Curaçao address as the mailing contact, which suggests an offshore footprint rather than a stateside registered office MyBookie Terms and Conditions.

That kind of listing on legal pages typically indicates the operator maintains an offshore mailing presence for legal notices and correspondence, though it does not on its own confirm the full corporate structure or ownership of the operating entity.

Review of Terms, Privacy and Contact pages

The Terms, Privacy and Contact pages are the primary on-site sources where operators disclose contact and legal details; MyBookie’s published pages provide those contacts but do not declare a U.S. corporate headquarters or a state registration, leaving the corporate domicile unclear to end users MyBookie Contact Us.

For a nonexpert reader, the practical takeaway is simple: use the site’s legal pages for immediate rules and contact details, but do not assume that a listed mailing address equals an incorporated headquarters or a state license.

What a Curaçao mailing address typically indicates

A Curaçao mailing address on a gambling or gaming site commonly signals that the operator has chosen an offshore jurisdiction for some or all of its administrative or regulatory footprint. That can be for licensing, tax, or operational reasons, but the mailing address alone is not definitive proof of where the company is incorporated or where executive management is located.

Because on-site mailing details are often combined with other disclosures, readers should treat a Curaçao address as an indicator that the operator is not presenting a U.S. corporate presence on its public pages.

How to interpret domain registration and WHOIS info for mybookie sports home

The mybookie.ag domain is registered under the .ag top-level domain, and an ICANN lookup for that name does not reveal a public registrant name, which limits transparent ownership verification for end users ICANN lookup.

Quick verification step before you deposit

Before you proceed with any account activity, check the site’s Terms and run an ICANN lookup to confirm what contact and registrant details are publicly available.

Check Terms and ICANN lookup

When a WHOIS or ICANN result omits a registrant name, it is commonly because the registration uses a privacy service or a proxy registration. Those services mask the registrant’s publicly visible details; they are valid but they increase the need for further checks rather than offering clear ownership proof.

What ICANN lookup shows for .ag domains

ICANN records for .ag domains can show the registrar and technical contacts while withholding the registrant name if privacy protection is enabled. That means the domain appears valid and active but does not provide a straightforward public trail to a named owner when privacy shielding is applied.

If you are verifying a site’s claims, a privacy-shielded WHOIS result should prompt you to seek corroborating evidence from the site’s legal pages and from regulator or corporate filings where available.

Limits of WHOIS data and privacy shielding

Privacy or proxy registration services exist to keep registrant details private and are commonly used across many industries; they do not, however, replace jurisdictional disclosures such as corporate filings or licensing records that would demonstrate where a company is registered for legal and regulatory purposes.

Because privacy protection creates an information gap, it is reasonable to treat a masked WHOIS as one factor among several when evaluating a site’s transparency and apparent location.

What regulators and industry groups say about offshore operators

Regulatory actions can directly affect whether a site is authorized to operate in a given U.S. state. For example, the Michigan Gaming Control Board issued cease-and-desist letters in December 2025 to offshore operators including MyBookie, stating that those sites are not authorized to offer wagering in Michigan Michigan Gaming Control Board press release.

The practical implication of such actions is that state regulators may publicly list a site as unauthorized, and those notices are useful signals when deciding whether to engage with an operator that lacks a clear state license.

Michigan Gaming Control Board action

The MGCB action clarifies that the listed offshore operators were not authorized in Michigan at the time of the notice, which is relevant for residents of that state when considering legal protections and enforcement avenues.

When a state regulator issues a public enforcement notice, it typically signals a mismatch between where the operator claims to serve customers and the operator’s licensing status under state law.

American Gaming Association guidance on consumer risks

Industry guidance from groups like the American Gaming Association emphasizes that offshore gambling sites operate outside U.S. regulatory frameworks, which can leave users without the same consumer protections or state-enforced remedies that would apply to licensed operators American Gaming Association guidance.

That guidance is a useful lens for understanding why on-site disclosures and domain records matter for consumer protection and dispute expectations.

Practical implications for US users considering mybookie sports home

If you are a U.S. user, the offshore status and the lack of an explicit U.S. corporate listing on MyBookie’s site can limit the effectiveness of state regulator remedies; the MGCB notice is a concrete example of a regulator identifying unauthorized offshore operations Michigan Gaming Control Board press release.

Funded Plays Challenges

Check Terms and ICANN lookup

The site’s Terms and Privacy pages describe how account and withdrawal terms are handled on the platform, and those on-site clauses are the immediate source of truth for dispute procedures, governing law and payment policies for account holders MyBookie Terms and Conditions.

Access and account issues

Users may encounter geo-blocking, restricted deposits, or account limitations if state regulators identify a site as unauthorized; the presence of an offshore mailing address often precedes such enforcement actions because the operator is not presenting a state-level license on site.

That means account access and withdrawal outcomes can depend heavily on the platform’s internal rules and the payment channels it supports as described in its terms.

What to expect for disputes and withdrawals

Because offshore operators may not be subject to state regulator enforcement, users often need to rely on the platform’s internal dispute processes and on the payment providers involved. Documenting transactions and following on-site dispute procedures is therefore important, since external recourse through a state regulator may be limited.

Review the site’s governing law clause and any stated dispute resolution steps before opening an account so you can plan what documentation to gather if an issue arises.

Planned marker: verification checklist for mybookie sports home

Step-by-step checks help you verify an operator’s apparent location. First, read the Terms, Privacy and Contact pages for any listed address, license claims and governing law statements, and note whether a Curaçao address or similar offshore contact appears MyBookie Terms and Conditions.

Second, run an ICANN or WHOIS lookup for the domain to see registrar information and whether the registrant name is visible; a masked WHOIS result means you will need additional corroboration from regulator or corporate filings ICANN lookup.

Step-by-step checks: domain, legal pages, public records

Third, check regulator websites in your state for enforcement notices or lists of unauthorized operators; regulator press releases can indicate whether your state flags the site as unauthorized or under investigation.

Finally, if you need higher confidence, seek corporate filings or press coverage that names the operating company, remembering that the absence of public corporate disclosures leaves ownership opaque in many offshore cases.

How to document findings

Keep dated screenshots of the Terms and Contact pages, save copies of WHOIS results, and archive any regulator notices you find. These records are the basis for a clear timeline if you later need to raise a dispute with a payment provider or a regulator.

Documenting sources also helps independent verification efforts and provides a file to reference if a regulator asks for evidence of your interactions with the site.

Planned marker: tools and quick checks to verify an operator

Useful tools include an ICANN lookup for domain registration details, your state regulator’s search or press page for enforcement notices, and a simple web archive snapshot to preserve on-site legal pages as you find them ICANN lookup. See the Funded Plays guide for a quick walkthrough of verification steps.

Quick verification steps to confirm a domain's public record and regulator status

Terms page
WHOIS/ICANN lookup
Regulator notice

Save dated screenshots

These quick checks are not exhaustive, but they are practical first steps to establish what a site openly discloses and what independent records exist to corroborate those disclosures.

Free online WHOIS and domain lookup tools

ICANN’s lookup is a reliable starting point for registrar and technical contact details; if the registrant name is masked, document that outcome and proceed to confirm via other public records.

Keep in mind that a masked WHOIS is common and not necessarily indicative of wrongdoing, but it does mean you should not assume ownership or corporate domicile from domain data alone.

How to crosscheck regulator notices and news

Search your state regulator’s website for active enforcement notices or press releases. A public listing by a regulator that a site is unauthorized is material to a resident’s decision whether to use that operator.

When in doubt, call the regulator’s consumer or licensing office with the domain name and ask whether the operator is licensed or listed in enforcement records.

Common mistakes and pitfalls when verifying an online sportsbook

A common error is treating a listed mailing address as definitive proof of corporate domicile. A mailing address can be used for correspondence without reflecting the company’s legal incorporation, and that distinction matters when assessing jurisdictional protections.

Another frequent mistake is assuming domain location equals operational headquarters; the domain TLD and registrant can reflect technical choices rather than corporate location.

Misreading mailing addresses as proof of corporate registration

Mailing addresses often serve as contact points for legal notices but do not necessarily reveal where the company is incorporated or where senior management is based. Treat such addresses as part of the evidence, not the conclusion.

If you need proof of incorporation, look for corporate filings in the jurisdiction the operator names or consult a regulator or a legal professional for verification steps.

Assuming domain location equals operational headquarters

Domains can be registered under a variety of TLDs for marketing or operational reasons, and a .ag domain does not by itself prove that a company’s headquarters are in Antigua and Barbuda, for example. Use WHOIS, on-site disclosures and regulator records together to form a clearer picture.

When WHOIS data is masked, that increases the need for corroborating evidence rather than lowering your guard.

Decision framework: Should a US user engage with MyBookie?

To decide whether to use MyBookie, weigh these factors: your state residency, whether your state regulator lists the operator as unauthorized, the site’s governing law and dispute clauses, and the clarity of withdrawal and payment terms. State regulatory notices such as the MGCB action are strong red flags for residents of those states Michigan Gaming Control Board press release.

If multiple criteria raise concerns, a conservative approach is prudent: consider regulated alternatives in your state and document any decision to engage with an offshore operator thoroughly. See the Funded Plays homepage for additional context Funded Plays.

Checklist of decision criteria

Ask: Am I in a state that has issued enforcement notices about this operator? Does the site show a state license or a known regulated license? Are withdrawal terms and dispute processes clearly stated? Answering these questions helps frame risk.

Keep in mind that a lack of U.S. licensing combined with a masked WHOIS and an offshore mailing address increases the practical risk of limited regulator recourse.

Red flags that argue against participation

Key red flags include a regulator listing the site as unauthorized, absent corporate disclosures on the site, or a masked registrant with no corroborating records. These indicators are grounds to pause before depositing funds.

If you are in a state that has publicly flagged a site, prefer regulated alternatives that provide state-level oversight and clearer consumer protections.

Examples and scenarios: Michigan resident, other US states, international users

Scenario, Michigan resident: the MGCB issued cease-and-desist notices that included MyBookie, which means Michigan regulators identified the operator as unauthorized within that state. A Michigan resident should treat that notice as a clear signal to avoid opening accounts with the site and to seek state-licensed options instead Michigan Gaming Control Board press release.

Scenario, resident of another U.S. state: if your state has not issued a public enforcement notice, you still face the same structural limits of offshore operators; check your regulator and the site’s on-site disclosures before deciding.

What the MGCB notice means for a Michigan user

The MGCB notice does not necessarily affect users outside Michigan, but for residents it indicates that the state considers the operator unauthorized and that state enforcement avenues may be limited for users who choose to engage with the operator despite that status.

Michigan residents should rely on their regulator’s guidance and avoid operators that the regulator has publicly identified as unauthorized.

How other states may differ

Some states actively monitor and report offshore operators, while others have less public enforcement. Always check your state regulator’s site for the most current guidance on licensed and unauthorized operators.

International users will need to refer to their own local laws and regulators, since the regulatory framework and consumer protections vary widely between countries.

How to raise disputes and what limits to expect with offshore sites

Document everything: dates, transaction records, screenshots of account balances and terms, deposit and withdrawal confirmations, and any messages exchanged with the platform. These records are the foundation for any dispute you raise with the platform, a payment provider, or a regulator.

Because offshore operators may not be subject to state enforcement, a regulator may have limited ability to compel an offshore operator to resolve a private complaint; industry guidance stresses this limitation for users dealing with offshore sites American Gaming Association guidance.

Steps to document issues

Start with dated screenshots of the site’s Terms and any relevant messages, collect transaction logs or bank statements, and follow the site’s on-page dispute process to create an official record of your complaint.

Submit documentation to payment providers if you used a credit card or third-party service, since those providers may have consumer dispute mechanisms independent of state gaming regulators.

When state regulators can and cannot help

State regulators can help when an operator is within their enforcement jurisdiction or when the operator holds a licensed presence that the regulator oversees. For offshore operators without a state license, regulators can issue warnings and public notices but may not be able to enforce individual consumer remedies against a foreign operator.

That limitation is a core reason to verify licensing and regulator status before funding an account with an offshore operator.

Alternatives and safer practices when you need regulated options

If you prefer regulated options, start by searching your state regulator’s website for lists of licensed operators and consult the regulator’s consumer guidance pages. You can also consult the Funded Plays blog for additional context Funded Plays blog.

Standard safety steps include creating strong passwords, enabling two-factor authentication, limiting initial deposits, and verifying withdrawal terms before funding an account.

How to find licensed, regulated operators in your state

Most state regulators publish a list of licensed operators or a search tool for licensees. Use the regulator’s official site to confirm whether an operator is licensed or publicly identified as unauthorized.

Licensed operators provide a clearer path for consumer complaints and regulator oversight compared with offshore operators that lack a state license.

Best practices for account safety

Use a unique password and two-factor authentication, keep deposit amounts modest until you are confident in the operator’s processes, and retain transaction records for future reference.

Confirm the site’s stated governing law and dispute process so you understand the steps the platform expects you to take in case of a problem.

Summary: key takeaways about mybookie sports home

MyBookie’s public pages show a Curaçao mailing presence and the mybookie.ag domain has a WHOIS record that does not reveal a public registrant, so the site presents itself as an offshore operator with limited transparent ownership disclosure MyBookie Terms and Conditions.

Regulators such as the Michigan Gaming Control Board have issued actions against offshore operators including MyBookie, and industry guidance notes that offshore sites operate outside state regulatory protections, which can limit consumer recourse Michigan Gaming Control Board press release.

Three clear action items for readers

Verify the site’s Terms and Contact pages for address details, run an ICANN or WHOIS lookup to check registrant visibility, and consult your state regulator’s website for any enforcement notices or licensing information.

These steps will help you determine whether to treat the operator as offshore and whether you have reasonable state-level protections if a dispute arises.