This preview shows how to form reasoned college football picks for the Notre Dame versus Ohio State matchup using established predictive frameworks and the most recent full-season benchmarks. It does not promise certainty; instead it offers a repeatable process to combine model baselines with roster and injury verification. Readers will find an explanation of how FPI and SP+ work, where to check 2024 performance to estimate returning production, which matchup details move probabilities most, and example pick templates that can be adapted when market lines appear.

Start projections with FPI and SP+ as neutral baselines, then update for returning production and availability.

A single head-to-head result is context, not a definitive predictor two seasons later.

Verified injuries, quarterback status, and transfer movement are the most likely factors to swing opening lines.

Quick take: Can we say which team is favored now? college football picks

Short answer and caveats

A firm favorite cannot be named before current market lines, updated injury reports, and offseason roster moves are available; early projections should start from well-established power ratings and then fold in returning production and availability checks. Analysts commonly use model baselines as the first filter, rather than relying on headlines or a single prior meeting, to form early college football picks.

As a practical baseline, the two most common predictive frameworks are ESPN’s Football Power Index and Bill Connelly’s SP+, which provide opponent-adjusted ratings and simulated win probabilities that help translate rating gaps into model-implied point spreads and chances of victory. For a clear explanation of how FPI produces win probabilities through season simulations, see the ESPN explainer on the subject ESPN’s FPI explainer. For the index itself, consult the ESPN FPI page ESPN FPI page.

Follow FundedPlays Challenges for structured, model-informed updates

Subscribe for timely updates and model revisions before kickoff so you can adjust your pick as lines and roster news arrive.

See Challenges and Model Updates

What a reader should expect from this preview

This article walks through how predictive models work, how to read FPI and SP+ outputs for Notre Dame and Ohio State, which roster and availability signals move projections most, and example pick templates tied to model gaps. The goal is to give a repeatable process for college football picks that balances model baselines with verified, late-breaking information.

How predictive models work and why analysts use FPI and SP+

What FPI measures

ESPN’s FPI is a predictive rating that expresses team strength in points above or below an average team and then uses season simulations to produce win probabilities; that simulation basis is why many analysts treat FPI as a starting point for early projections. For readers who want the methodological background, the ESPN overview describes how FPI uses simulations and ratings to estimate outcomes ESPN’s FPI explainer.

Bill Connelly’s SP+ focuses on tempo- and opponent-adjusted efficiency rather than raw scoring margins, which helps identify teams that are systematically better or worse than raw results suggest; that opponent-adjusted efficiency is useful when two teams faced very different calendars. The original methodological introduction explains how SP+ treats tempo and opponent adjustment as central inputs SP+ methodology primer.

How simulations and win probabilities are produced

Both frameworks convert efficiency or rating gaps into outcome probabilities by running many simulated matchups or by mapping rating differences to expected point spreads; using both models together gives a more robust baseline because they emphasize complementary aspects of team performance. Use model outputs as a neutral baseline and then test whether roster changes or injuries create credible deviations from that baseline. For a model-focused preview of matchup projections, see SI's coverage SI analysis of model projections.

2024 benchmarks: What last full season tells us

Final rankings and what they indicate

Both Ohio State and Notre Dame finished inside the final 2024 College Football Playoff Top 25, which confirms that this pairing projects as a high-level matchup rather than a clear mismatch; that placement is a practical starting point when building early projections for 2026 2024 CFP final Top 25. For a timeline of recent FPI updates tied to Notre Dame, see the Fighting Irish Wire recap Fighting Irish Wire FPI update.

How much should the recent meeting matter?

Ohio State’s 17-14 win in South Bend on Sept. 23, 2023, is useful context for matchup tendencies and recent history, but a single head-to-head outcome should not override season-long efficiency metrics or significant roster turnover when forming picks two years later Ohio State vs Notre Dame game summary.

Who is favored to win, Notre Dame or Ohio State?

A definitive favorite cannot be named until current market lines, verified injury reports, and offseason roster movements are known; start with FPI and SP+ baselines and update as verified information arrives.

To benchmark returning production and scoring margins from the most recent full seasons, team pages that compile 2024 schedules, results, and stat breakdowns are the right source to consult before making a 2026 projection 2024 Ohio State stats and results.

Likewise, Notre Dame’s 2024 team page is a practical place to check snap rates, starter lists, and scoring margin trends when estimating which contributors are likely to matter in 2026 2024 Notre Dame stats and results.

Key matchup factors that shift projected win probability

Quarterback stability and offensive continuity

Quarterback clarity is often the single largest roster variable that changes a game projection; a settled starter with returning chemistry and proven decision-making narrows uncertainty and tends to move model-based win probabilities more than peripheral roster moves. When a quarterback role is unsettled, treat model baselines as provisional until starting status is confirmed through reliable sources.

Offensive line, rushing and pass defense matchups

Offensive line play and the ability to establish or stop the run create game scripts that materially affect how a matchup plays out; if one team controls the line of scrimmage, it can limit a high-tempo attack and change expected possessions, which forces model adjustments in how tempo and efficiency translate to scoring.

Special teams and situational performance

Special teams, red zone efficiency, and turnover margin often act as decisive tiebreakers when ratings are close; these factors are smaller inputs to models but should be treated as potential edge-makers in tight games, especially where both teams show similar FPI or SP+ ratings from the baseline.

Compare FPI and SP+ for Notre Dame and Ohio State: reading the numbers

What to look for in overall rating gaps

Minimalist side by side FPI and SP plus dashboards showing highlighted team metrics and a simple projected probability bar for college football picks

When you compare FPI and SP+ outputs for two teams, focus on whether both models agree on a meaningful rating gap or whether only one shows an advantage; agreement across models strengthens the baseline projection and makes the model-implied spread more reliable. The FPI methodology describes how rating differences map into win probabilities and expected points, which is central to translating a numeric gap into a betting view FPI explanation.

How tempo and opponent adjustment change matchup views

SP+’s tempo and opponent-adjusted lens can make a team that looks dominant on raw margin appear more or less so after accounting for schedule strength; that adjustment helps when two programs do not share comparable opponents and you need an apples-to-apples matchup baseline SP+ primer.

When model outputs diverge, the next step is to inspect the underlying drivers on each team’s 2024 pages to see whether differences stem from opponent strength, close-game variance, or a small sample of one-sided matchups rather than systematic efficiency changes Ohio State 2024 reference.

Funded Plays Challenges

See Challenges and Model Updates

Interpreting matchup-based point spreads from model outputs

Both FPI and SP+ provide a neutral expected-point framework that can be converted into a predicted spread and a win probability; where the models concur on several points of advantage, market opening lines often follow closely, making those games suitable for disciplined, model-informed college football picks.

Returning production, transfers and roster turnover to watch

How to quantify returning production from 2024 stats

Use the 2024 team stat pages to total returning starters’ production, focusing on snap rates, percentage of team offensive and defensive snaps, and primary receiving or rushing shares; these items let you estimate how much of the prior production carries forward into the next season Notre Dame 2024 reference.

Minimalist 2D vector checklist for college football picks showing four icons representing model baseline roster check injury confirm and final line check on a dark branded background

Key transfer portal impacts

Transfer arrivals or departures can alter projections quickly because a single high-impact portal move at quarterback, pass rusher, or offensive line can shift both efficiency and depth calculations; track confirmed portal moves rather than rumors when adjusting model baselines.

Depth chart stability

Weight starters’ proven snaps more heavily than late-season backups when projecting 2026 roles, and remember that depth matters for late-season durability and injury replacement; a team that retains experienced rotational depth typically sustains performance better across a season.

Injuries, availability and depth: late-breaking factors

Why injuries can swing short-term market edges

Injuries to a starting quarterback, multiple offensive linemen, or a premier pass rusher are the kinds of availability issues that routinely force model revisions and move market lines, because they directly affect a team’s ability to execute its core game plan.

How to track credible injury news

Prioritize official team injury reports, press conferences, and beat reporters with a track record of accurate availability updates; avoid acting on unverified social posts until confirmation from a named source or a team statement is available.

Track starter availability and injury confirmations

Source
Confirmed status
Notes

Verify via team reports

When to change a pick because of availability

Change a pick when a verified report shows a starter, especially at quarterback, will miss the game, or when multiple starters are confirmed out and their replacements have limited experience; in those circumstances the model baseline should be adjusted before committing money or a rostered pick.

How opening lines and markets typically mirror models

Relationship between power ratings and opening lines

Opening betting lines commonly track established power ratings like FPI and SP+ and recent team performance, so early market favorites usually reflect these objective baselines rather than novelty narratives; viewing early lines as a model proxy is a practical starting point for college football picks FPI methodology.

Why oddsmakers move lines after breaking news

Sharp money, sudden injury revelations, or last-minute depth concerns push lines away from model baselines because markets price updated probability information more quickly than static ratings; watching early market movement helps you detect when new information is driving consensus changes.

When market edges appear

Market edges can appear when models mark a consistent gap but public sentiment or unclear injury information pushes the line the other way; disciplined bettors look for those dislocations and require strong verification before deviating from their model-informed view.

Game script scenarios and betting implications

Projected game scripts based on efficiency mismatches

Efficiency mismatches, such as one defense that consistently stops the run against a team that relies on a ground game, produce predictable scripts: a successful run defense forces more passing attempts, which can change expected possessions and variance; translate that into betting by considering how a new script affects expected total points and spread dynamics.

How scripts affect total and spread bets

If you expect a run-heavy script, the total may compress and the favored team can win by shorter margins in a controlled, low-possession game; conversely, if a matchup suggests open-field passing advantages, expect higher totals and more swing in the spread as explosive plays create larger scoring swings.

Scenario-based pick examples

Use model outputs plus a script read to choose between spread, moneyline, or total plays. For example, if models show a small advantage and you expect a low-possession game, a conservative spread lean with smaller sizing may be preferable to aggressive moneyline exposure.

Common mistakes bettors make on high-profile college games

Overreacting to a single head-to-head result

Do not overweight the most recent head-to-head meeting; one game can reflect unique circumstances and should not override an aggregated season-long efficiency picture unless roster and coaching contexts remain identical.

Ignoring depth and special teams

Bettors who neglect depth and special teams in close matchups often miss small but decisive edges; include red zone rates, kick coverage, and backup experience in tight projections.

Chasing public narratives

Chasing narratives without evidence creates negative expected value; disciplined bettors focus on process, verification, and disciplined sizing rather than following popular storylines that the market has already priced.

Example scenarios and sample college football picks for readers

If ratings show a small gap

Template 1: Small-model gap. If FPI and SP+ both show a narrow edge and returning production is roughly even, treat the game as coin-flipish and use a conservative stake size, such as a single unit or a fraction of your standard stake, while monitoring lines for late movement.

If one team leads in efficiency and returning production

Template 2: Model and roster alignment. When both models and returning starter metrics point to the same team, consider a larger, yet still measured, allocation that reflects the degree of model agreement; keep sizing proportional to your bankroll rules and reserve room for variance.

How to size picks and manage variance

Template 3: When injuries or late news create uncertainty, reduce size or wait for confirmed information; across many picks, fixed percentage staking and record-keeping of outcomes beats erratic, emotion-driven sizing over time. Use the models as a baseline and calibrate size to the confidence gap between model agreement and roster clarity FPI methodology.

When and how to update your pick as kickoff approaches

Monitoring model updates and ratings

Check the latest FPI and SP+ snapshots close to kickoff to quantify whether model drift exceeds a practical threshold for changing your pick; small day-to-day noise should not force changes, but consistent, directional revisions in both models merit reevaluation SP+ primer.

Tracking confirmed injuries and depth changes

Compare verified injury reports and depth-chart confirmations to your initial assumptions; use team stat pages to confirm returning starters and snap distributions when available Ohio State 2024 reference.

Final checklist before placing a pick

Before committing, run this three-item checklist: quantify model drift, verify availability of key starters, and watch for meaningful line movement that indicates market information. If all three align with your read, place a sized, disciplined pick.

Responsible approach: discipline, bankroll rules and avoiding tilt

Simple bankroll rules for big games

Adopt fixed-percentage staking rather than sizing a single game by feeling; fixed staking reduces ruin risk and smooths variance over a season, which is essential when targeting long-term performance from college football picks.

How disciplined systems beat impulse bets

Documenting selections, maintaining rules for when to deviate, and reviewing outcomes periodically turns short-term luck into long-term learning; a repeatable process outperforms impulse choices in the long run. For more on how Funded Plays evaluates challenges and maintains consistency, see the Funded Plays evaluations page Funded Plays evaluations.

Using structured evaluation over chasing short-term wins

Funded challenge frameworks emphasize consistency and rule-following rather than chasing outsized wins, and adopting a similar evaluation mindset helps bettors maintain discipline while testing strategies against model baselines. Learn more on our blog our blog or visit Funded Plays Funded Plays.

Conclusion: How to form a responsible, model-informed pick for this game

Summary of evidence-based decision steps

Start with FPI and SP+ as your neutral baselines, then adjust for returning production and roster turnover using 2024 team pages, check credible injury reports and depth confirmations, and finally compare your adjusted projection to market lines before sizing a pick 2024 CFP final Top 25 context.

Final recommendations before lines and after they open

Without current lines and verified availability, a definitive favorite cannot be declared; treat early projections as provisional, update them as reliable data arrives, and follow a disciplined workflow that prioritizes model agreement, verified roster information, and prudent sizing before placing college football picks.

How should I use FPI and SP+ together?

Use FPI for a simulation-based win probability baseline and SP+ for tempo-adjusted efficiency signals; weigh both and inspect underlying stats before adjusting for roster changes.

When do I change a pick because of injuries?

Change a pick when a verified source confirms a starter, especially at quarterback, will miss the game or when multiple starters are ruled out and replacements lack experience.

Is the 2023 head-to-head result decisive for 2026 picks?

No, a single prior meeting is informative but not decisive; season-long efficiency, returning production, and offseason changes matter more for projections two years later.

Treat early projections as a structured starting point rather than a final verdict. Update your view with reliable roster and availability information, compare to the market, and size picks consistently to preserve a long-term edge. Good process and verification matter more than single-game outcomes.