This article answers which NBA team is most liked using a practical, four-signal method. Instead of relying on opinion polls alone we compare social media followers, national TV ratings, official merchandise rankings, and in-venue attendance to create a repeatable, evidence-based picture. You will find a concise verdict up front, a clear explanation of how each signal works, a suggested weighting method you can apply yourself, and a focused case study comparing the Chicago Bulls and Charlotte Hornets. The goal is a transparent, actionable approach that analysts, marketers, and curious fans can replicate.

No single metric defines "most liked"; combining social, TV, merchandise, attendance, and valuation gives a clearer answer.

The Golden State Warriors lead on global digital reach and franchise value while the Chicago Bulls lead home attendance.

Different weights change outcomes, so choose the signals that match your purpose before declaring a winner.

Quick answer and executive summary

Short verdict - bulls hornets prediction

Short verdict: there is no single, uncontested "most liked" NBA team when you combine digital reach, broadcast demand, merchandise purchases, local attendance, and franchise valuation; the Golden State Warriors lead on global digital and commercial signals, the Chicago Bulls demonstrate the strongest home-market attendance, and smaller-market clubs such as the Charlotte Hornets lag on in-venue measures but can still show strengths not captured by those metrics Statista Instagram ranking.

Explore the full challenges and evidence-based breakdown on the FundedPlays Challenges page

Read the full breakdown below to see how each signal was measured and to compare Bulls and Hornets side by side.

View FundedPlays Challenges

The executive approach here triangizes four observable signals rather than relying on public sentiment alone. That makes the conclusion practical for marketers, analysts, and curious fans who want a repeatable method rather than an opinion poll result.

What follows is a detailed explanation of each signal, a simple weighting method you can apply, and an evidence-based comparison that shows where the Warriors, Bulls, and Hornets lead or lag.

How we measure popularity: bulls hornets prediction signals explained

We use four measurable signals to approximate which teams are most liked: social media followers, national television audience concentration, official merchandise and jersey sales, and in-venue attendance. Each signal captures a different dimension of popularity, from global digital reach to local event demand.

Social media followers measure potential reach and passive interest. National TV ratings show who drives broad viewing demand. Jersey and merchandise rankings indicate consumer purchase intent. Attendance measures local engagement and the willingness of fans to attend games in person. Survey-based sentiment complements these signals but is not the sole basis here.

Instagram follower totals are a practical proxy for global digital fanbase size; as of June 2026 the Golden State Warriors led NBA teams on Instagram, a sign of outsized global digital appeal that often translates into higher reach for content and sponsorships Statista Instagram ranking.

Follower counts do not equal active engagement, and a large following can include casual or international fans who rarely interact (see Hootsuite Instagram statistics).

Funded Plays Challenges

View FundedPlays Challenges

When you compare Instagram totals with other signals, a team that leads followers and also has high merchandise sales and TV presence is more plausibly described as widely liked, because multiple independent measures point the same way (see HypeAuditor NBA Instagram stats).

National TV audience: which teams drive broadcast demand

National TV ratings reveal concentrated interest in certain matchups; in 2024-25 most of the year s top-rated national NBA broadcasts featured the Warriors, Los Angeles Lakers, or Boston Celtics, which suggests those franchises drive substantial broadcast demand Sports Media Watch NBA ratings.

Full frame photo showing a packed Chicago Bulls arena opposite an empty Charlotte Hornets seating section highlighting attendance contrast bulls hornets prediction

Television concentration favors franchises with star players, championship relevance, and national storylines. Schedule effects matter, so a team s TV draw can be amplified by marquee opponents or playoff implications even if local attendance patterns differ.

Because ratings reflect where television audiences tune in, they are a strong indicator for marketers and broadcasters who need to know which teams attract a national audience rather than only local fans.

Merchandise and jersey sales: purchase intent as a popularity signal

Official midseason jersey rankings are an authoritative proxy for purchase intent because they reflect actual consumer choices rather than stated opinion; the NBA Communications midseason list is one such official signal and is useful for assessing which players and teams convert interest into merchandise purchases NBA Communications jersey list.

Quick checks to compare official jersey and merchandise rankings

Season
Team
Player
Rank

Use the NBA Communications releases as the primary reference

Merchandise rankings are often a stronger signal of purchase intent than survey measures because they capture what people actually buy, but interpreting those numbers requires attention to short-term effects and player-driven spikes.

In-venue attendance: local engagement and what it misses

Attendance measures are a direct indicator of local-market engagement. For 2025-26 the Chicago Bulls led the NBA in home attendance while the Charlotte Hornets were below the league average, showing a clear difference in local event demand between the two franchises ESPN NBA attendance report.

Factors that influence attendance include arena capacity, market size, ticket pricing, and local promotions. A team with strong attendance has an engaged local fanbase, but attendance alone does not capture national or international fan interest that appears in social and broadcast metrics.

Attendance remains one of the most reliable measures of in-person support, and it matters especially when evaluating local sponsorships, game-day experiences, and community engagement strategies.

Commercial reach and franchise value: what Forbes valuations reveal

Franchise valuations provide a commercial lens on popularity. Forbes valuations for 2024 placed the Golden State Warriors at the top, which aligns with strong brand power and international revenue potential rather than just local affection Forbes most valuable teams.

Valuation reflects diversified revenue streams, media rights, and brand strength. High value often correlates with broad commercial reach, but it is not the same as subjective likability in surveys or social sentiment.

Which NBA team is most liked when combining social following, TV ratings, merchandise sales, attendance, and valuations?

There is no single definitive answer; the Golden State Warriors lead global digital reach and valuation, the Chicago Bulls lead in home attendance, and which team is "most liked" depends on which signals you prioritize.

Readers should weigh commercial value as one input among several rather than treating it as proof of emotional attachment or grassroots fan loyalty.

Combining the signals: a practical ranking method and its limitations

To make the signals actionable we propose a simple weighted approach: assign a weight to each signal, normalize each team s score on that signal from 0 to 1, and compute a weighted sum. For example a balanced starting point is social media 30 percent, TV ratings 25 percent, merchandise 25 percent, and attendance 20 percent, which privileges global reach while still valuing local engagement. The underlying social media input can use normalized Instagram follower totals as the baseline Statista Instagram ranking (see Statista followings dataset).

Applying different weights changes the outcome. If you prioritize local partnerships or in-arena activation, increase the attendance weight. If you are a broadcaster or brand seeking national reach, raise the TV rating weight. This sensitivity is why no single number is definitive and why transparency in weighting matters.

Limitations to note include schedule bias in ratings, merchandise spikes driven by single players, and the international distribution of followers that may not translate to local support. Survey sentiment provides additional perspective but tracks favorability in a way that can differ from purchase and viewing patterns YouGov team popularity data.

Case study: Bulls vs Hornets - what the data actually show

Using the four-signal method highlights a stark contrast: the Chicago Bulls show strong home attendance, which is a proxy for durable local engagement, while the Charlotte Hornets sit below the league average on in-venue turnout according to 2025-26 attendance data ESPN NBA attendance report.

On other signals the Hornets may over-index in specific niches such as regional youth engagement or localized social activity, but those strengths do not offset the broader attendance gap unless they also translate into merchandise purchases, national broadcast interest, or measurable digital reach.

For a Bulls vs Hornets apples-to-apples comparison you can normalize each team s metric and then apply your chosen weights. If attendance carries greater weight for your purpose the Bulls will rank higher. If global social reach or national TV exposure is your priority, other franchises can overtake both depending on the weighting choices.

Other contenders and unexpected findings

Beyond the Warriors, Lakers, and Celtics, which dominate Instagram and TV attention, other teams can lead specific signals in given seasons. Star player popularity and recent championships produce short-term shifts that can push teams up merchandise lists or into more national broadcasts Sports Media Watch NBA ratings.

For example, a team that signs a widely recognized star or reaches the finals can see a sharp merchandise and TV ratings bump, even if its long-term attendance or franchise valuation lags the league leaders. Those dynamics are important when interpreting a single-season claim of being the "most liked" team.

Common mistakes and interpretation pitfalls

A frequent mistake is treating a raw follower count as proof of active fandom. Large followings include passive and international audiences, which is why cross-checking with engagement, merchandise purchases, and attendance matters.

Another common error is overinterpreting single-season spikes caused by player moves or a deep playoff run. Robust claims require confirmation across multiple signals and across more than one season where possible.

How fans, analysts, and marketers should use the results

Fans can use this four-signal framework to get a clearer sense of a team s relative reach. Analysts can adapt the weights to match research goals. Marketers should prioritize TV ratings and merchandise if the goal is national exposure and direct sales, and attendance if the objective is local activation.

When communicating findings, always specify which signals you used and the weights applied. That transparency reduces misinterpretation and makes it easier to update the ranking as new data arrive.

Implications for platforms and alternative models

Platforms that run skill-based sports prediction challenges or fundraising activations can use these signals to tailor promotions and user acquisition. For example a prediction platform might highlight matchups that feature high-TV-draw teams to increase engagement, or focus on markets with strong attendance for local activations YouGov team popularity data.

FundedPlays is a skill-based sports prediction platform that evaluates users through structured challenges and virtual funded accounts. Neutral, evidence-based popularity measures can inform educational content and challenge design without implying guaranteed outcomes for participants.

Conclusion: who leads and what that really means

Tying the signals together, the Golden State Warriors lead on global digital reach and commercial valuation, the Chicago Bulls lead on in-venue attendance, and several legacy franchises like the Lakers and Celtics dominate national TV ratings and often merchandise lists Forbes most valuable teams.

Declaring a single "most liked" team is reductive because the outcome depends on which signals you weight most heavily. For broad global reach and commercial power the Warriors are the strongest single name across multiple measures, while the Bulls are a clear leader where local attendance matters ESPN NBA attendance report.

If you want to replicate or update this ranking, gather the four signals for your target season, normalize each metric, and run a sensitivity check across a range of reasonable weights to see how stable the leaderboards are. That process will show whether a team s lead is robust or sensitive to reasonable changes in the model.

How does social media following relate to being the most liked team?

Social media following signals potential reach and visibility but does not prove active fandom; it should be combined with engagement, merchandise sales, and attendance for a fuller picture.

Can a team with low attendance still be widely liked?

Yes. Teams with lower local attendance can still have strong national or international followings reflected in social and broadcast metrics, so context matters.

Does a high franchise valuation mean fans like the team more?

Not necessarily. Valuation reflects commercial revenue streams and brand strength rather than direct measures of affection or loyalty.

If you want to recreate this analysis for a different season gather the four signals, normalize each team's score, and test a range of weights to see how stable the ranking is. That process makes claims about the "most liked" team more defensible and easier to update. For readers interested in skill-based sports prediction and evidence-driven content, apply these popularity signals when designing challenges or selecting matchups for analysis while keeping messaging responsible and factual.