This short guide answers a single question many readers search for: how many points were the Bears down against the Packers in the Jan 7, 2024 regular-season finale. It gives a clear, sourced short answer, then walks through the scoring timeline and shows how to verify the claim using authoritative box scores. The focus is factual verification rather than betting interpretation. Where the phrase bears packers point spread appears, it is used only to clarify terminology so readers understand why a largest in-game deficit differs from pregame or live betting lines.

Chicago's largest in-game deficit in the Jan 7, 2024 Bears-Packers game was 11 points, trailing 17-6.

The final score was Green Bay 17, Chicago 9, with Chicago's points coming on three field goals.

Confirm the 17-6 timing by checking scoring-by-quarter and the scoring plays on Pro-Football-Reference or NFL.com.

Short answer: how many points were the Bears down against the Packers?

The Chicago Bears' largest in-game deficit in the January 7, 2024 Week 18 regular-season game at Lambeau Field was 11 points, when they trailed the Green Bay Packers 17-6 in the second half; the final score was Green Bay Packers 17, Chicago Bears 9, as shown in the official box score on Pro-Football-Reference Pro-Football-Reference box score.

For readers checking terminology, this article uses the term bears packers point spread only to explain why a largest in-game deficit is different from betting lines, and then walks through the scoring timeline that produced the 17-6 margin.

Quick confirmation tool to check the largest in-game deficit from an official box score

Final score
Scoring by quarter
Scoring plays

Cross-check two sources

Game summary and scoring timeline

Quarter-by-quarter scoring

The game opened with both teams trading early possessions and the half concluded with Green Bay leading 7-6, a halftime line that shows the first lead change and sets the stage for the second-half margin that became the largest deficit, as recorded in the scoring-by-quarter table CBS Sports game recap and scoring summary.

In the third quarter Green Bay extended the lead with a field goal that moved the score to 10-6, and later in the game the Packers added another touchdown that pushed the margin to 17-6, which represents the largest lead they held during the contest; the box score and scoring plays list these events by quarter and time.

Sequence of scoring plays and when the largest deficit occurred

Chicago's nine points came entirely from three field goals at different points in the game, while Green Bay scored on two touchdown plays and a field goal to reach 17, a scoring distribution that is visible in the play-by-play and scoring summary Pro-Football-Reference box score.

Close up tablet showing official style box score with highlighted scoring by quarter and play by play lines for Bears vs Packers bears packers point spread

The timing that creates the 17-6 score is straightforward: Green Bay took the first lead with a second-quarter touchdown, increased the lead with a third-quarter field goal, then added a later touchdown before Chicago's late field goal narrowed the final margin to 17-9; that sequence explains when the Bears were down by 11 points and why that is counted as the largest deficit.

Box score details: how the official sources confirm the largest deficit

To confirm the largest in-game deficit you read two parts of an official box score, the scoring-by-quarter line and the scoring plays list; the scoring-by-quarter line shows the 17-6 score in the quarter where Green Bay added the second-half scores, and the scoring plays list gives the play descriptions and times that make the sequence unambiguous, which you can verify on NFL.com's game page NFL.com game summary.

Funded Plays Challenges

View challenges and verify with Funded Plays

When you open a box score such as the Pro-Football-Reference entry, look for the row that shows points by quarter to see where the 17 total for Green Bay and the 6 for Chicago line up, then open the scoring plays, which list each scoring event with quarter and time to show exactly when Green Bay reached a 17-6 edge Pro-Football-Reference box score.

A practical check is to count Chicago's scoring events in the scoring plays list to confirm there are three field goals and to confirm Green Bay's two touchdown entries plus a field goal; those entries together explain the final 17-9 score and the earlier 17-6 lead.

How to verify the fact yourself using authoritative sources

Start with a quick checklist: 1) confirm the final score, 2) read the scoring-by-quarter row for the 17-6 entry, 3) read the scoring plays to check quarter and time stamps, and 4) cross-check at least one other reputable recap if needed; official game pages and established box-score archives are the best starting points NFL.com game summary.

As a second step, open a trusted recap such as CBS Sports or ESPN to see a narrative timeline and any additional context that confirms the order of scoring plays, which helps to resolve ambiguous reports and confirms that Green Bay held an 11-point advantage at its peak in that game CBS Sports game recap and scoring summary.

Check the official box scores and recaps

Check the official box score and a major recap to confirm the scoring-by-quarter row and the scoring-play timestamps before sharing the claim.

View challenges and verify with Funded Plays

If you prefer a quick single-source check, Pro-Football-Reference lists scoring by quarter and play-by-play entries in a compact format; for a narrative recap with context, pair it with a major outlet recap to confirm the sequence.

When sources use slightly different phrasing-one describing a late touchdown drive and another the same drive's final play-compare the quarter and time stamps in the scoring plays to resolve differences; the timestamps are the decisive factor for establishing when a particular margin existed.

Point spread, largest deficit, and why they are different things

The term bears packers point spread commonly appears in search queries, but it refers to a pregame or live betting line designed to balance betting action, which is a different concept from the largest in-game deficit, the latter being the maximum margin one team trailed during the actual play of the game.

Minimal two column vector timeline showing second quarter touchdown third quarter field goal later touchdown and three Bears field goals placed by quarter bears packers point spread

Reporting the largest in-game deficit means reading the scoring progression and noting the single largest margin by which one team led; it does not depend on any pregame expectations or betting lines and is determined solely by the scoring events and their timing in the box score.

Readers sometimes confuse the two because both use the word spread or margin, but the verification steps in this article look only at scoring results and timestamps to determine that Chicago's largest deficit was 11 points during the Jan 7, 2024 game.

Why the final mattered: playoff implications and contemporaneous reporting

Beyond the numeric result, the Packers' 17-9 victory over Chicago had postseason implications: that win clinched a playoff berth for Green Bay, a fact reported in team press material and major recaps at the time Packers team recap.

Contemporaneous media coverage noted the game context while the box score recorded the scoring progression that produced the largest in-game deficit; combining those two views is the clearest way to present both the game consequence and the factual scoring timeline ESPN box score and recap.

Common errors when reporting scores and how to avoid them

Reporters and casual sharers often make three recurring mistakes: they conflate betting point spreads with actual scoring margins, they misread the scoring-by-quarter row and attribute a different quarter to a scoring play, or they miscount scoring events when field goals and safeties are present; checking the scoring plays list and the scoring-by-quarter row prevents all three errors Pro-Football-Reference box score.

To avoid errors, always read the scoring plays for quarter and time stamps, verify the tally of scoring events against the final total, and cross-check at least one additional reputable source before publishing a numeric claim about a game's largest deficit.

As a last step, avoid relying solely on headlines because they sometimes focus on context or consequences rather than the precise scoring chronology; a short box-score read is the simplest fact check before sharing a score-based claim.

Final recap and key takeaways

In short, Chicago's largest in-game deficit against Green Bay on January 7, 2024 was 11 points, when they trailed 17-6, and the final score was Packers 17, Bears 9, a fact verifiable in the official box score and play-by-play summaries Pro-Football-Reference box score.

How many points were the Bears down against the Packers in the Jan 7, 2024 game?

Chicago's largest in-game deficit was 11 points, trailing 17-6; the final score was Green Bay 17, Chicago 9.

Recommended next steps: check the scoring-by-quarter row and the scoring plays in Pro-Football-Reference or the NFL.com game page to confirm the 17-6 timing yourself before citing the largest deficit.

What was the largest deficit the Bears faced against the Packers on Jan 7, 2024?

Chicago's largest deficit was 11 points, when they trailed Green Bay 17-6; the final score was 17-9 in favor of the Packers.

How can I confirm the scoring timeline myself?

Check the scoring-by-quarter row and the scoring plays in an official box score (for example Pro-Football-Reference or NFL.com) and cross-check with a major recap.

Does the largest in-game deficit equal the betting point spread?

No, the largest in-game deficit is the maximum margin during play; the betting point spread is a pregame or live market line and is unrelated to the actual scoring progression.

If you need to cite this fact, use the scoring-by-quarter row and the scoring-play timestamps from Pro-Football-Reference or the NFL.com game page as primary evidence. Those sources list the quarter, time, and scoring description that make the 17-6 largest deficit clear. For broader context about how scoring timelines affect game narratives, pair a box score check with a reputable recap from a major outlet; that combination provides both the numeric proof and the narrative framing.