This article gives a clear, evidence based answer to the question of which hallucinogen Aaron Rodgers has publicly discussed. It summarizes his on the record comments, explains what ayahuasca is, and outlines the legal, league, and health implications that readers commonly ask about. The goal is to present primary reporting and official documents so readers can distinguish verified statements from rumor. If new, verifiable first person statements appear, the public record should be updated accordingly.

Aaron Rodgers has publicly named ayahuasca as a substance that helped his mental health in on the record comments.

Ayahuasca contains DMT and MAO inhibitors and can cause intense perceptual effects and nausea.

The NFL said Rodgers would not face discipline in the reported case, and anti doping lists and federal laws remain separate considerations.

Short answer: which hallucinogen has Aaron Rodgers publicly discussed?

Aaron Rodgers has publicly discussed using ayahuasca, and his on the record comments tie that experience to improvements in his mental health and to factors he associated with past MVP level play. That is the only hallucinogen Rodgers has publicly credited through the last available reports.

Funded Plays Challenges

Explore FundedPlays Challenges

The direct source for Rodgers describing the experience comes from a news report in August 2022 in which he told reporters that an ayahuasca experience helped his mental health and that he connected it to prior peak seasons, a first person account on the public record. Local coverage also reported on the comments in regional outlets such as Spectrum News 1 Spectrum News 1.

Readers should treat this short answer as a summary of verified public statements rather than a comprehensive medical or legal analysis. If Aaron Rodgers makes any new, verifiable first person statements, or if authoritative records change, that would be the basis for updating the public record.

Brief summary for readers who want a direct answer

In plain terms, the verified public record shows Rodgers naming ayahuasca specifically; there are no other verified first person admissions about other hallucinogens in the sources available up to 2026.

Why this question matters for fans and sports coverage

Fans, commentators, and bettors often look for clear facts about a public figure because those facts shape narratives. Knowing what is on the public record helps separate verified disclosure from rumor and speculation.

What Aaron Rodgers has said on record about ayahuasca

Key quotes and contexts

In August 2022, Rodgers told reporters that an ayahuasca experience improved his mental health and that he linked it to elements of his prior MVP seasons. That exchange was reported directly by a major news outlet and reflects a first person statement attributed to Rodgers during a media interaction Reuters report. Other national coverage also examined his remarks, including reporting in The Guardian The Guardian.

When reporting on Rodgers words, reliable outlets quoted his phrasing and the context in which he discussed the experience. Those direct quotes are the primary basis for saying Rodgers has publicly credited ayahuasca with a personal benefit rather than descriptions from unnamed sources or social media speculation.

Follow up public appearances and statements

Rodgers later appeared at a public conference focused on psychedelic research and policy in mid 2023, where he reiterated favorable views about psychedelics and again referenced ayahuasca in that public setting; this appearance provides additional on the record context for his stance NBC Sports - ProFootballTalk coverage. Longer profile coverage and cultural pieces also discussed his public remarks and related media, including a feature in Vanity Fair Vanity Fair.

Across these on the record comments, the pattern in the public record is that Rodgers named ayahuasca specifically. There are no verified public claims, in the cited coverage through the latest available sources, that he has used other hallucinogens.

What ayahuasca is: ingredients, effects, and typical risks

Ayahuasca is commonly described in scientific and health resources as a psychoactive brew that typically combines a DMT containing plant with a vine that supplies monoamine oxidase inhibitors, most often from Banisteriopsis caapi, which allows oral activity of DMT and produces powerful changes in perception and consciousness NCCIH page.

Understand rules before you predict

Please read the health and legal sections below to understand how ayahuasca’s effects and legal status may differ from public discussion and media narratives.

Explore FundedPlays Challenges

The subjective effects reported by people who use ayahuasca commonly include intense alterations in sensory perception, shifts in emotional processing, and strong introspective experiences. Acute physical reactions can include nausea and vomiting, which are often reported in clinical and ethnographic literature as part of the experience rather than unrelated side effects NCCIH page.

Full frame educational photo of Banisteriopsis caapi vine and Amazon understory plants on dark Funded Plays background with soft lighting natural colors and clear botanical detail bears packers point spread

Because ayahuasca combines DMT with MAO inhibitors, it can interact with a range of medications and underlying health conditions, and its intensity and physiological effects mean that supervision and careful screening are commonly advised in clinical contexts and research settings. Health agencies who study these substances emphasize variability in individual reactions and the importance of medical context.

Legal, league, and anti-doping considerations for athletes

U S federal scheduling of DMT

Under United States federal law, the primary psychoactive component often present in ayahuasca, DMT, is listed as a Schedule I controlled substance, making its manufacture, possession, or distribution subject to federal criminal statutes unless a specific legal exception applies eCFR Schedule I listing.

NFL stance and how league policy applied in Rodgers case

In August 2022 the NFL publicly stated that Rodgers would not face league discipline for the ayahuasca use reported at that time, and the league clarified how its policy was applied in that specific instance based on the available information NFL statement.

That public statement reflects how the league chose to interpret and apply policy in a particular case and does not alter federal scheduling or broader legal frameworks. League policy and national law operate on separate tracks and may have different standards for review, disclosure, and enforcement.

WADA position and athlete compliance

The World Anti Doping Agency published a 2025 Prohibited List that, as of that edition, does not explicitly name classic psychedelics such as DMT; athletes remain subject to both anti doping rules and national laws, and those frameworks are distinct from media coverage or personal statements by athletes WADA announcement.

Athletes should understand that compliance questions involve reading the specific rules that apply to their competitions and jurisdictions, and public statements about personal use do not automatically determine eligibility or disciplinary outcomes under all regulatory regimes.

Health implications and safety considerations

Clinical and public health descriptions of ayahuasca emphasize acute effects such as intense perceptual change and common physical reactions like nausea and vomiting; these are well described in accessible health agency summaries and reviews NCCIH page.

Beyond short term reactions, ayahuasca’s combination of DMT and monoamine oxidase inhibitors means it can interact dangerously with certain prescription medications and with some underlying medical conditions. Health officials advise that people consult qualified medical professionals and treat reports of psychedelic use with appropriate caution.

Quick checklist to verify medical sources and safety guidance

Source name
Date
Author
Evidence type
Conflicts of interest
Notes

Use for initial screening of health pages

The information above is informational and not medical advice. For individual decisions, especially for athletes who must consider league rules and medical screening, professionals such as licensed clinicians and team medical staff are the appropriate advisors rather than media reports or social media commentary.

Minimalist 2D vector infographic with three icons representing legal league and health frameworks on dark Funded Plays style background bears packers point spread

Did the NFL discipline Rodgers for ayahuasca use?

Timeline of the league response in 2022

In August 2022 the NFL published a statement saying that Rodgers would not face discipline in relation to the reported ayahuasca experience; that public record shows how the league applied policy given the facts available to it at that time NFL statement.

The league comment was narrowly focused on disciplinary action and did not address legal status at the federal level, anti doping frameworks, or private medical decisions. When public bodies issue statements about a specific case they often limit comment to the disciplinary question at hand and avoid broader legal analysis.

What the NFL statement did and did not say

The NFL statement established that no discipline would follow from the particulars as understood in August 2022 but did not imply any shift in federal drug scheduling or in the policies of other organizations. Readers should interpret such statements as case specific and time bound.

Are there verified reports Rodgers used other hallucinogens?

What is on the public record through the latest reports

Through the most recent verified sources available by 2026, Rodgers has publicly named ayahuasca and has not made verified first person statements crediting other hallucinogens; the August 2022 report and the 2023 conference appearance are the primary on the record instances where he discussed psychedelics publicly Reuters report.

What hallucinogen did Aaron Rodgers publicly say he used?

Aaron Rodgers publicly said he used ayahuasca and has credited it with helping his mental health; that is the only hallucinogen he has publicly discussed in the available records through 2026.

That pattern means current summaries should be careful to attribute claims to the public record and to update if Rodgers provides new, verifiable first person information. Anonymous tips, social media speculation, and second hand accounts do not replace direct quotes and reputable reporting when establishing what a public figure has said.

For researchers and journalists, the correct practice is to treat first person statements and reputable outlet reporting as primary sources and to demand corroboration before reporting new claims as fact.

Why this matters for fans, bettors, and media narratives

Public statements by high profile athletes shape media narratives and fan discussion because they influence how people interpret a player’s choices and public persona. That influence exists independently of whether a disclosed experience has any measurable effect on performance.

For bettors and analysts, it is important to separate personal disclosures from reliable predictive signals. Betting decisions should be informed by performance data, injury reports, matchup analysis, and disciplined bankroll principles rather than by unverified speculation about a player’s personal history or health disclosures.

How journalists and researchers verify claims about public figures

Verification prioritizes primary sources. Direct quotes from the person in question and reporting from established outlets that include those quotes are the strongest basis for asserting that a particular statement was made. The August 2022 report and the 2023 conference coverage exemplify this practice NBC Sports - ProFootballTalk coverage. See our blog post on how Funded Plays evaluations work for more on verification and evidence standards.

Anonymous reporting or third party assertions should be treated cautiously and require corroboration before they alter a public record entry. Checking dates, full quotations, and original reporting documents is a practical starting point for assessing whether a new claim is verified.

Common misinformation and pitfalls when discussing celebrity drug use

Typical misinformation risks include treating rumor as fact, misattributing a quote, and generalizing from a single event to broad conclusions about behavior or performance. These errors spread when secondary sources do not check primary reporting.

To avoid repeating unverified claims, prefer named sources, require direct quotes when possible, and be ready to correct content when stronger information emerges. A transparent correction policy helps preserve credibility when reporting on sensitive personal topics.

Practical scenarios: what fans, bettors, and athletes should do with this information

If you are a fan or commentator, stick to verified facts and avoid suggesting that a personal disclosure guarantees any change in on field performance. Personal health experiences are private and complex, and clear attribution to primary reports helps maintain accuracy.

If you are a bettor or analyst, do not treat personal disclosures as reliable betting signals. Instead rely on measurable performance indicators, medical reports that are officially released, and disciplined evaluation criteria when making decisions about wagers or predictions.

If you are an athlete considering psychedelics for therapeutic reasons, consult licensed medical professionals and legal advisors to understand medical risks and the legal environment. Health agency materials describe typical reactions and interactions that make professional guidance important NCCIH page.

How and when this article should be updated

Update this article if Aaron Rodgers issues a new, verifiable first person statement about any substance, if the NFL or another governing body releases new policy guidance that affects disciplinary interpretation, or if national law or anti doping lists are revised in ways that affect the substances discussed here. You can also monitor the Funded Plays homepage Funded Plays for related updates.

Reliable places to watch for updates include major news outlets that publish original reporting, official NFL statements, WADA announcements, and health agencies that publish reviews or guidance WADA announcement.

Summary and key takeaways

Ayahuasca is the only hallucinogen Aaron Rodgers has publicly discussed through the latest available reports, and he has attributed personal mental health benefits to an ayahuasca experience in on the record comments Reuters report.

The NFL said in August 2022 that Rodgers would not face discipline for the reported ayahuasca use at that time, a case specific statement that did not change federal scheduling NFL statement.

From a health and legal perspective, ayahuasca contains DMT and MAO inhibitors and carries known acute effects such as intense perceptual changes and nausea, while DMT is a Schedule I substance under U S federal law, which creates distinct considerations for users and for enforcement agencies NCCIH page

Treat new, verifiable first person statements as the proper trigger for updates to this record and prefer primary reporting from reputable outlets when assessing claims about public figures.